Delivery-Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2015 11:58:26 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_ALL,
	DKIM_SIGNED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham
	version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 342AB1E0A33
	for <archiver@seul.org>; Sun, 26 Apr 2015 11:58:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30A7B3476C;
	Sun, 26 Apr 2015 15:58:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 171D93440F
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun, 26 Apr 2015 15:58:12 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 8M7u74IpQRvQ for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Sun, 26 Apr 2015 15:58:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.openmailbox.org (mail.openmailbox.org [62.4.1.34])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D904E344BA
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun, 26 Apr 2015 15:58:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by mail.openmailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3B7F2E067F
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun, 26 Apr 2015 17:58:08 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=openmailbox.org;
 h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type
 :in-reply-to:references:subject:subject:mime-version:from:from
 :date:date:message-id:received; s=openmailbox; t=1430063887; bh=
 9nO1jMoei4/JYihBJDmpdcA9nCE9mQurpcxEi6xJmpI=; b=iocU3sT03HHU/+Z5
 +g5LWbMAjKaxEs6wUeDMDSnft4ffuYww6gBIx3T3Y2/QlEi9vvFoL29JuS5UKjd+
 mV+tP/1aaTRx/WlaSmv1WJp0/xgS8Z6Ia6D5oV6OQZiwrKtN8+XUn0J1atsXtgnq
 p4Gm1ovt/hVoyanqcGa2Kqmsmp8=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at openmailbox.org
Received: from mail.openmailbox.org ([62.4.1.34])
 by localhost (mail.openmailbox.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026)
 with ESMTP id KFRgGk_MqJ8x for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Sun, 26 Apr 2015 17:58:07 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <553D0B01.5040602@openmailbox.org>
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2015 15:57:53 +0000
From: nusenu <nusenu@openmailbox.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <223eaa337204f5f94241636062f9a9e4.webmail@localhost>
 <20150423040805.GA7800@moria.seul.org> <20150423043420.GA15244@nymity.ch>
 <55394871.4010205@openmailbox.org> <20150424024723.GC6723@nymity.ch>
 <20150426111941.9DF6DAE417@smtp.postman.i2p>
 <20150426123406.CC579AE418@smtp.postman.i2p>
In-Reply-To: <20150426123406.CC579AE418@smtp.postman.i2p>
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] MyFamily requires a mutual agreement
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

> This makes for an interesting counter-example: if the MyFamily 
> declaration was used as reason for setting BadExit on related
> exits, a malicious adversary could set their MyFamily to the same
> as a good exit cluster, and then intentionally behave badly, in
> order to get the good cluster flagged as BadExit.
> 
> My point is, the MyFamily declaration is completely
> unauthenticated, and cannot be relied upon for anything more than
> providing contact information. There is a newer iteration being
> discussed that would prevent relays from joining families without
> permission, but then a malicious exit provider would have even less
> motivation to set it up.

Since MyFamily declarations have to be mutual to actually build a Family
group, your described attack scenario does not work.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=rJDh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

