Delivery-Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 15:16:13 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FB831E007E
	for <archiver@seul.org>; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 15:16:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4623D34C46;
	Fri, 24 Apr 2015 19:16:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A99F34C95
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 19:16:01 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id nYnT7bXMqhXf for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Fri, 24 Apr 2015 19:16:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-lb0-x22f.google.com (mail-lb0-x22f.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22f])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E22534C46
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 19:16:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by lbbuc2 with SMTP id uc2so43579915lbb.2
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 12:15:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
 :from:to:content-type;
 bh=posc5UXFw4hlPB99vpIfTCRdEgtNeqf1DijH1uF2cd8=;
 b=QJmgWIJsz+tNk2bdbToR252/zGsgr+ILRPKBMSmgM4hZPBlmxaUEywghaUklrChYjL
 WogAhcbl96aVG/rUe8u2vPUUKSvfICZ7B0abw4cTzwLeLGZ4PbO4CcHWNEWMeSdOGAwW
 G8VwBCbksXrxY/G7ag+kcuICxPh03+/eZh7Wj7R0Y/T6rXzopx2htP2LXzzfo5fMzTPx
 RsT0Sml0liqZ575TxXVte88kx0vGEftAPpopqk2/XkQyYdNl52nCjUdfidwYgOsRLxtb
 nJQ2gw+sYb2S1sQPnebK4R97LzWL9pMKWCPdoh4aKp0i/01FUcoYrak4v+YiHd8qXLlx
 SCZg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.3.161 with SMTP id d1mr8097118lad.70.1429902957803; Fri,
 24 Apr 2015 12:15:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.27.6 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 12:15:57 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <04cd01d07eb3$92109370$b631ba50$@gmail.com>
References: <553a6eb9.9d8.3cfa3700.49dfd88b@t-3.net>
 <553A787A.4040004@gmail.com>
 <04cd01d07eb3$92109370$b631ba50$@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 12:15:57 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: GcOYji7VstggOKO5pwrDuc4m9rM
Message-ID: <CAMTdTS8jT45RcQa=19yE=TZCW58_AWWZ11GMtEsaGrOWzfdq4Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: benjamin barber <barberb@barberb.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Clarification of Tor's involvement with DARPA's Memex
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

I think the correlation between wanking and war is only a confounding
variable to the amount of easily obtainable sexual gratification and
reproductive success.

That being said,

I have been working on solar powered tor servers that run project
maelstrom, with public tor2web instances in azure.

But I dislike the current management sooo much, that I really dont feel
like even releasing it, and waiting to build on project maelstrom mixed
with maidsafe instead.


https://archive.is/Kj8Sx
https://archive.is/FgnZ5
https://archive.is/ctN0v
https://archive.is/YMBqA
https://archive.is/LRebw
my sides

https://archive.is/nl4OA
https://archive.is/rh9hq
https://archive.is/WmyXa
https://archive.is/8boZD
https://archive.is/cqElZ
https://archive.is/LeHFq
https://archive.is/rYMb9
https://archive.is/LCIQV
"muh hurasssment"


On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Allen <allenpmd@gmail.com> wrote:

> More wanking = fewer wars, so that is a need, IMO, along with food, water,
> shelter and medical care.
>
> Beyond that, define "need".  Privacy and freedom from government and
> corporate surveillance are fundamental rights, IMO.  Keeping your internet
> activity private from your ISP and the world-at-large is a perfectly valid
> use of Tor.  You can't expect someone else to keep private what you are not
> willing to keep private yourself.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tor-talk [mailto:tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org] On Behalf Of
> aka
> Sent: Friday, April 24, 2015 1:08 PM
> To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Clarification of Tor's involvement with DARPA's
> Memex
>
> [TRIGGER WARNING]
>
> Outgoing traffic stats from Tor exit nodes. Almost all traffic of Chinese
> speaking Tor users is average adult porn, which is banned in China. You can
> tell it's from China because the sites are aimed to Hong Kong residents.
> The
> "Chinese people use Tor because they are supressed in their free speech and
> really want to post on the internet how bad China is" is a lie, almost all
> of them just want to wank.
> Tell me one hidden service which needs anonymity, has more than 100 users
> and is not a drug market place or furry porn community for computer science
> PhDs.
> Don't get me wrong, Tor is a beautiful and necessary tool for people to
> ignore their goverments regulation on what to put in their bodies and what
> to watch, but it really isn't what the liberal hivemind wants to believe.
> The idea of Tor is in no way compatible with govermental regulation, every
> cooperation with LE will be a nail in Tor's coffin.
>
>
> --
> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

